we have SERIOUS demands. Annapolis must listen now.

We, the taxpayers of Maryland, call for a comprehensive realignment of state governance—one that redefines how public services are managed and funded. Our vision embraces a transition from outdated, fragmented practices to an integrated system characterized by fiscal discipline, transparency, and innovation. By restructuring state spending around principles of efficiency and accountability, we can streamline bureaucratic processes, modernize regulatory frameworks, and implement data-driven policymaking. Our leaders in Annapolis must recognize the urgency of these reforms and commit to transforming governance for a sustainable, accountable future that benefits every Marylander.

Tax realignment

Maryland will transition from a traditional income tax system to a structure based on land value taxation, consumption taxes, and levies on externalities. This reform is designed to internalize external costs, reflect genuine economic activity, and link revenue generation to measurable service improvements. Growth-oriented taxation will allow Maryland to continue to reduce the tax burden on individuals over time, especially with improved fiscal discipline in budgeting practices.

  • Institute a statewide tax on the unimproved value of land, with differentiated rates to preserve our farms and forests and avoid expanding suburban sprawl while capturing speculative economic rents without penalizing productive use.

  • Adjust the tax structure to levy consumption on discretionary goods and services while exempting basic necessities, ensuring the tax base reflects current spending patterns across Maryland.

  • Introduce taxes on activities that generate external costs, such as air pollution from industrial practices, encouraging cleaner practices and funding environmental remediation.

  • Connect incremental tax receipts to performance benchmarks in sectors such as education, healthcare, and transportation, guaranteeing that additional funds yield verifiable service improvements.

  • Phase out legacy tax exemptions that create economic imbalances, replacing them with targeted incentives that reward demonstrable improvements in efficiency and quality.

  • Utilize state-level predictable tax instruments to create a steady revenue stream capable of supporting long-term, fiscally-disciplined planning for urban renewal projects in cities like Baltimore.

  • Utilize the state tax on the unimproved value of land to eliminate local income taxes, encouraging greater workforce participation and allowing workers greater discretion in what they consume.

  • Ensure that county and municipal governments adopt outcome-based budgeting models that directly tie revenue increases to improved service delivery, with pilot programs in certain services, eventually expanding to all parts of the budget.

  • Consolidate tax collection processes for all taxes and streamline compliance procedures to reduce burdens on taxpayers and local government agencies.

  • Provide transitional support for businesses adapting to the new tax environment, including advisory services and phased implementation schedules tailored to different sectors.

  • Allocate a portion of new tax revenues to reducing or eliminating corporate income taxes, allowing Maryland to remain competitive in retaining and attracting new businesses and jobs.

  • Establish a robust public reporting mechanism that details tax revenue allocation and performance outcomes, fostering accountability and citizen engagement.

Spending Controls

Maryland will implement a rigorous fiscal discipline framework to ensure that every expenditure is justified and aligned with service outcomes. By employing outcome-based budgeting, strict cost-accounting, and extending the all-payer rate-setting model to various public services, the state will control expenditures and optimize the allocation of public funds.

  • Establish a statewide budget limit, from all sources, that ties nominal annual expenditure increases to objective, external indicators such as population growth and productivity metrics.

  • Mandate that each state agency revalidates its entire budget every fiscal cycle, requiring a detailed justification for every expense to eliminate unnecessary spending and consolidate administration.

  • Link budget increases directly to performance improvements in critical areas such as public health, education, and infrastructure, with explicit, quantitative benchmarks and targets.

  • Remove safe harbor provisions and non-DSH payments that enable inflated Medicaid cost claims, ensuring that public reimbursements are based on audited, verifiable service delivery expenses.

  • Expand the all payer rate-setting mechanism — successfully applied to hospital pricing — to areas such as childcare subsidies or compensation for medical providers, standardizing cost growth across services.

  • Require increased comprehensive audits of all state spending by independent, empowered oversight bodies, with findings published in highly-accessible, well-publicized reports.

  • Effectively empower a central fiscal oversight committee that brings together representatives from all state agencies to coordinate spending strategies and continuously eliminate redundancies.

  • Develop specific, quantifiable benchmarks for each agency, ensuring that expenditures are directly linked to improvements in service delivery and operational efficiency while reducing administrative expenses.

  • Institute mandatory, periodic renegotiations for long-term agreements to reflect current market conditions and eliminate outdated pricing structures that no longer represent actual service costs.

  • Integrate stricter penalty provisions in construction and infrastructure projects that hold contractors financially accountable for delays or overruns, ensuring adherence to budgets and improving quality.

  • Require that all significant service providers undergo periodic benchmarking against industry standards, with contractual adjustments enforced when costs exceed established global norms.

  • Shift from variable, fee-based payments to fixed-payment schemes for recurring and costly public services, stabilizing costs and ensuring predictable budget planning from year to year.

Economic diversification

Maryland will diversify its economy by redirecting resources from stagnant sectors to dynamic, high-growth industries. By developing innovation clusters and targeted industrial policies, the state will foster sectors such as advanced manufacturing, biotechnology, renewable energy, and digital media. This strategic shift will enhance local competitiveness, stimulate job creation, and build a resilient economic foundation across the state.

  • Replace flat-rate subsidies with incentive programs that award funding based on key metrics, such as startup formation, patent filings, and job creation.

  • Establish a state-sponsored task force to coordinate research and development projects across diverse sectors, promoting partnerships between universities, research institutions, and private enterprises that drive cross-industry innovation.

  • Design tax incentives for companies that expand into new markets or diversify their product lines, with credits contingent on achieving clearly defined growth and performance targets.

  • Adjust state purchasing policies to favor vendors contributing to economic diversification, stimulating demand for high-performing, highly-automated, and innovative products and services from emerging sectors.

  • Launch programs that allow businesses in novel sectors to test new ideas in regulatory sandboxes, reducing risks and encouraging experimentation.

  • Offer grants and targeted tax credits to encourage businesses in manufacturing and services to invest in robotics, process automation, and smart production systems, reducing labor costs and boosting competitiveness.

  • Implement comprehensive training initiatives focused on digital skills, robotics, and automation technologies to prepare workers for the demands of a modern, technology-driven economy.

  • Identify and invest in economic clusters outside established urban centers by streamlining permitting processes and supporting local infrastructure upgrades, thereby stimulating growth in underdeveloped regions.

  • Improve data-driven monitoring systems that regularly assess sectoral-specific industry performance, allowing policymakers to adjust strategies dynamically based on real-time economic indicators and market conditions.

  • Implement strategies to optimize the blue economy by investing in sustainable fisheries, marine biotechnology, and coastal tourism; establish a goal to grow blue economy revenue by enhancing coastal infrastructure, supporting eco-friendly maritime businesses, and increasing workforce training.

  • Develop expanded agritourism and viticultural initiatives that connect Maryland’s agriculture with consumer experiences while enhancing quality of agricultural products and encouraging innovation.

  • Form a multi-stakeholder council comprised of industry experts, academic leaders, and economic advisors tasked with overseeing diversification, ensuring accountability, and refining strategies based on performance.

Regulatory Streamlining

Maryland will simplify its regulatory environment by consolidating redundant agencies and standardizing procedures to reduce administrative delays and costs. Targeted reforms in occupational licensing and zoning will lower barriers for professionals and developers while ensuring that regulations serve the state's economic and social objectives efficiently.

  • Establish statewide automatic permitting for energy production, transmission, and storage, eliminating discretionary delays and empowering clean energy projects to flourish.

  • Establish a standardized system for permit applications and fee structures that applies consistently across the state, reducing administrative fragmentation and accelerating approvals.

  • Develop uniform guidelines for enforcing regulatory requirements, ensuring that penalties and compliance measures are applied consistently across all jurisdictions.

  • Reform licensing regulations to eliminate redundant requirements and excessive fees, ensuring that qualified professionals in fields such as construction and healthcare can enter the market with fewer obstacles.

  • Revise zoning codes to reflect current urban development trends, effectively tackle the housing crisis, and simplify the approval process for new construction projects in cities like Baltimore.

  • Introduce automatic expiration dates for regulations, ensuring that rules are periodically reviewed and only continue if they demonstrably serve the public interest and objectively improve outcomes when accounting for second- and third-order impacts.

  • Merge state and local regulatory bodies and governmental departments with similar functions into single entities to streamline processes, lower costs, reduce staffing, and eliminate conflicting mandates.

  • Implement policies that automatically approve projects meeting pre-set criteria, especially in infrastructure and energy sectors, to stimulate rapid deployment of innovative solutions.

  • Prioritize market-based approaches by reducing state intervention in industries where competition and innovation can drive efficiency and lower costs, thereby fostering an environment of economic abundance.

  • Establish an interagency task force to harmonize overlapping regulations, particularly those affecting environmental standards and building codes.

  • Provide training and professional development for regulatory staff to keep abreast of best practices and evolving industry standards, ensuring effective policy implementation.

  • Commit to continuous improvement in regulatory practices with the goal of unleashing untapped market potential, driving economic growth, and delivering widespread prosperity across Maryland.